Because both are WAY better than the crap you watch on Smackdown.
Wow... And how tangiable is THAT?
As insane as I feel for doing it, I still watch the majority of the WWE & TNA product so I wanna know what makes TNA or RAW
apparently so much better.
Raw has stunk for most of 2009. Guest GMs have sucked virtually EVERY week, no-one had shit to do apart from the established ME-ers. Talented mid-carders have been rotting on there all year thanks to abandoned pushes & storylines or simply not being featured at all. The current WWE champ can bearly even get any TV time.
TNA are still fumbling about, undermining some great matches with dodgy booking/storylines and are about to embark on this Hogan-era which is looking terribly iffy after just ONE show.
At least SD had a hot few months during the summer (When they dominated the WWE PPV scene whilst IMO, match-wise outperforming both TNA & the rest of the WWE.) and successfully got someone (Punk) over as a credible ME-er.
...See, THAT's how you attempt to make a point. Your smart-ass, one-line bullshit is worthless C4. Next time just don't bother calling my post out to start with.