- Joined
- Dec 18, 2011
- Messages
- 39,124
- Reaction score
- 5,642
- Points
- 118
- Age
- 31
- Location
- God's Country, Sheffield UK

Quite possibly one the most iconic images in pro wrestling history, Stone Cold Steve Austin refuses to tap out in the sharpshooter his face a crimson mask. It's widely regarded as the image which began the Attitude Era.
Quotes like this from @[Randy Savage]
yes but we have not seen blood in like 3 years or more now WE NEED BLOOD BADLY! And Kane would be 1 to do with since him gimmick is baisc of a fire and blood!
Made me think about creating this thread. What's your opinion on blood in the WWE?
Mine is that it can be used as a great storytelling tool, providing it's not abused. After all the effect is weakened if every week someone's face is a bloody mess, doesn't it? I also don't believe the possible health side effects should be forced upon the wrestlers. They have a tough enough job as it is, without being put in the risk of infections. In summary I'm a fan of blood being used rarely as it can help build a character but not if it happens just for the sake of having blood.
What does everyone else think?